Spotting the Difference: Identifying Player Opponent Preferences in FPS Games
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper describes a study designed to understand player responses to artificially intelligent opponents in multi-player First Person Shooter games. It examines the player‟s ability to tell the difference between artificially intelligent opponents and other human players, and investigates the players‟ perceptions of these opponents. The study examines player preferences in this regard and identifies the significance of the cues and signs players use to categorise an opponent as artificial or human.
منابع مشابه
Robust Opponent Modeling in Real-Time Strategy Games using Bayesian Networks
Opponent modeling is a key challenge in Real-Time Strategy (RTS) games as the environment is adversarial in these games, and the player cannot predict the future actions of her opponent. Additionally, the environment is partially observable due to the fog of war. In this paper, we propose an opponent model which is robust to the observation noise existing due to the fog of war. In order to cope...
متن کاملBalancing Safety and Exploitability in Opponent Modeling
Opponent modeling is a critical mechanism in repeated games. It allows a player to adapt its strategy in order to better respond to the presumed preferences of his opponents. We introduce a new modeling technique that adaptively balances exploitability and risk reduction. An opponent’s strategy is modeled with a set of possible strategies that contain the actual strategy with a high probability...
متن کاملOpponent Models and Knowledge Symmetry in Game-Tree Search
In this paper we investigate the role of symmetry in knowledge of the opponent during gameplaying by computers. The games under consideration are board games like Chess: large-scale two-player zero-sum games of perfect information. The solution of such games is easily defined but since these board games are large and complex, it is not feasible to obtain an actual solution. Research in Artifici...
متن کاملTit for tat: Foundations of preferences for reciprocity in strategic settings
This paper assumes that in addition to the conventional (sel sh) preferences over outcomes, players in a strategic environment have preferences over strategies. In the context of two-player games, it provides conditions under which a player's preferences over strategies can be represented as a weighted average of the individual's sel sh payo s and the sel sh payo s of the opponent. The weight o...
متن کاملTit for Tat: Foundations of Preferences for Reciprocity in Strategic Settings By
This paper assumes that in addition to the conventional (sel sh) preferences over outcomes, players in a strategic environment have preferences over strategies. In the context of two-player games, it provides conditions under which a player's preferences over strategies can be represented as a weighted average of the individual's sel sh payo s and the sel sh payo s of the opponent. The weight o...
متن کامل